USCIS Updates Policy to Ensure Petitioners Meet Burden of Proof for Nonimmigrant Worker Extension Petitions
USCIS Updates Policy to Ensure Petitioners Meet Burden of Proof for Nonimmigrant Worker Extension Petitions
WASHINGTON — under
updated policy guidance (PDF, 97 KB), U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services (USCIS) is instructing its officers to apply the same level of
scrutiny to both initial petitions and extension requests for certain
nonimmigrant visa categories. The guidance applies to nearly all nonimmigrant
classifications filed using Form I-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker.
“USCIS
officers are at the front lines of the administration’s efforts to enhance the
integrity of the immigration system,” said USCIS Director L. Francis Cissna.
“This updated guidance provides clear direction to help advance policies that
protect the interests of U.S. workers.”
As
before, adjudicators must thoroughly review the petition and supporting
evidence to determine eligibility for the benefit sought. The updated
guidance instructs officers to apply the same level of scrutiny when reviewing
nonimmigrant visa extension requests even where the petitioner, beneficiary and
underlying facts are unchanged from a previously approved petition. While
adjudicators may ultimately reach the same conclusion as in a prior decision,
they are not compelled to do so as a default starting point as the burden of
proof to establish eligibility for an immigration benefit always lies with the
petitioner.
The
previous policy instructed officers to give deference to the findings of a
previously approved petition, as long as the key elements were unchanged and
there was no evidence of a material error or fraud related to the prior determination. The
updated policy guidance rescinds the previous policy.
Under
the law, the burden of proof in establishing eligibility for the visa petition
extension is on the petitioner, regardless of whether USCIS previously approved
a petition. The adjudicator’s determination is based on the merits of each
case, and officers may request additional evidence if the petitioner has not
submitted sufficient evidence to establish eligibility.
Comments
Post a Comment
Thanks for your Response...!